Can You Get a Buy-to-Let Mortgage With a CCJ?

Home / Blog

A County Court judgment does not produce one universal answer to a buy-to-let mortgage application. Some lenders exclude recent judgments entirely; others consider particular amounts, dates and satisfied records. The property’s rent and your deposit still matter, but neither makes the credit history disappear.

Start by establishing exactly what is recorded. A satisfied judgment, a cancelled record and an unresolved judgment are different positions. Then ask a broker to match the actual facts to current criteria before paying application or valuation fees.

What does a CCJ record show?

A CCJ is a County Court judgment for debt in England and Wales. The terminology and procedures elsewhere in the UK differ. Give the adviser the judgment date, amount, creditor, case reference, current balance and any payment or court documents.

GOV.UK’s judgment and credit-rating guidance explains that a judgment generally remains on the register for six years. Paying in full within one month can allow removal; paying later can allow it to be marked satisfied while the record remains.

That distinction explains why “I paid it” may not answer a lender’s question. Check that your documents and credit records accurately show what happened. If something is incorrect or disputed, use the relevant court or credit-record process rather than omitting the information from the application.

Why one lender can say no while another considers it

Credit policy is lender-specific. Checked on 19 October 2026, Accord’s buy-to-let credit criteria exclude CCJs within the stated six-year window, including registered or satisfied records. A satisfied balance does not remove that policy restriction.

Foundation’s published criteria instead require CCJs, court decrees and defaults to be satisfied at application, with other credit restrictions depending on the product. That does not mean any satisfied judgment guarantees acceptance.

A broker needs to consider the current product guide as well as the general policy. Number, size, recency and the wider credit history can change the available route. Avoid treating a broker’s broad “we consider adverse credit” statement as a mortgage offer.

Prepare a short factual explanation

Describe what caused the debt and judgment, when you discovered it, what you did and how your finances have operated since. Keep this factual and consistent with the evidence. A clear explanation is more useful than a long account that leaves the dates or balance uncertain.

For example, a landlord might have a single old disputed utility bill, several unpaid consumer debts or an unresolved judgment alongside mortgage arrears. Those situations should not be presented as identical just because each includes the letters CCJ.

Give the broker the complete position at the start. If another judgment, default or missed payment appears later, a lender shortlist built on incomplete information may no longer be suitable. Accuracy saves time even where the facts make the application harder.

Check the whole credit picture

Review existing mortgages, loans, credit cards and other commitments. Identify arrears, arrangements and any recent applications. Provide the evidence requested by the adviser, including credit reports from the relevant agencies where appropriate.

A clean recent payment pattern can help the adviser understand today’s position, but it does not cancel a lender’s explicit exclusion. Similarly, a numerical credit score shown by a consumer service is not a lender’s own underwriting decision.

If you own a property company, disclose relevant director and guarantor history. A company application does not necessarily bypass personal credit assessment. The company mortgage guarantee guide explains why the people behind an SPV can remain central to the loan.

A more expensive loan changes the deal

Consider a £150,000 interest-only mortgage. Compare illustrative rates of 5.5% and 6.5%, with £1,000 more unavoidable setup costs on the second option. These are sensitivity assumptions, not rates available to any particular applicant or a claim that all CCJs produce this price difference.

A property expected to leave £250 a month before tax and exceptional repairs at the first rate would leave £125 at the second, before recovering the extra fee. The question is whether the investment still works at the offer you can actually obtain.

Use the mortgage stress calculator to test the proposed balance and rate. Add fees and realistic property costs separately. Do not judge the investment against a rate available only to a different borrower.

A bigger deposit is not an automatic cure

A lower LTV can improve the overall lending proposition, but it cannot override a lender’s absolute credit restriction. Ask the broker whether deposit size changes the shortlist or whether the judgment itself remains the decisive constraint.

Keep enough money after the deposit for repairs, empty periods, legal costs and personal commitments. Using every pound to reach a lower LTV can leave the borrower more vulnerable to the next unexpected bill, even if the mortgage becomes easier to arrange.

The cash-reserve guide helps separate purchase money from the buffer needed to operate the investment. Settling an outstanding debt and increasing a deposit also compete for the same cash, so make the complete budget visible.

Would waiting change the position?

A judgment’s age can change which policies a case meets, but do not assume waiting a fixed number of months guarantees a mortgage or a cheaper deal. Other criteria, rates, income and property values may also change.

Ask the broker to explain the relevant dates and what improvement would actually follow under current policy. There is a difference between waiting for an exclusion period to pass and hoping that a lender will overlook the record later.

Compare the financial effect of buying now with waiting. Include the costs of a more expensive mortgage, the purchase’s likely income, your alternative use of the deposit and the value of improving financial resilience. Keep future house-price movements as uncertain scenarios.

Be careful with a refinance exit assumption

If the plan is to use a specialist mortgage now and refinance to a cheaper lender later, test that future application separately. The judgment may still be within another lender’s exclusion period, while rent cover or valuation could restrict borrowing.

Record the earliest plausible date, the remaining product period and any early repayment charge. An expensive mortgage can be reasonable in a specific plan, but the plan should not depend on an unverified promise that refinancing will become straightforward.

Read the product-transfer and remortgage comparison when assessing the eventual switch. The present lender’s existing-customer route and a new lender’s full application can lead to different outcomes.

A joint application needs both credit histories

If two people apply, establish the full position for both. A strong second applicant does not automatically neutralise a judgment against the first. The lender’s policy can apply to every borrower, and the ownership and mortgage arrangements need to match the genuine transaction.

Do not remove an owner from an application solely to conceal a credit issue. Tell the broker who will own the property, provide the deposit and benefit from the rent. It can then assess a lawful, accurately described structure and any conditions affecting non-borrowing owners or contributed funds.

If the property is already jointly owned, a change may also require the existing lender’s consent and legal work. That is a separate transaction from finding a lender whose credit policy is suitable.

What should be confirmed before an offer?

Ask which lenders can consider the documented credit position, what fees may become payable before full approval and what property or rent conditions remain. Make sure the adviser knows the intended ownership structure and whether you already have a portfolio.

Then obtain realistic rental and condition evidence. A credit-acceptable borrower can still have an unacceptable property, and a high yield cannot compensate for legal or construction problems. Keep those parts of the application separate so one favourable answer is not mistaken for complete approval.

Questions about CCJs and buy-to-let